Gigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 16:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 887
83% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 86A4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 111
79% 103 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 95
Splatting 89
86% 109 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1183 1238 1278 1280 1302 1306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 1,291
Mixed 983
SusWrite 1,264
272% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 66.6
223% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 272
323% 558 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 229%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 25.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 17-XA Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback