HP 400-335d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 400-335d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 13:21
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 369
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
75GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 402 396 405 396 391 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 338
Mixed 301
SusWrite 399
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 51.9
159% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 117
155% 281 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 145 158 174 162 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 99
Write 108
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 162
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 400-335d Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 400-335d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback