HP 400-335d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 400-335d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 11:31
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 55.7
28% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 379
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.6
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 307 340 352 333 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 376
Write 352
Mixed 346
SusWrite 340
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 17.2
56% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 271
199% 262 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 123%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 165 169 170 167 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 184
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 167
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 400-335d Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 400-335d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback