Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6570 2,846 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 59.5 32% 49.1 Pts	4-Core 60.8 8-Core 63.7 8% 62.2 Pts	64-Core 60.5 4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300 2,791 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 7016) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.4 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.5 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC4OC60D SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 21 18 42 52 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 46 Write 13.3 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 38.4 20% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 104% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6570IntelBench 34%, 2,846 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T6670IntelBench 35%, 2,094 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80