MSI MS-1795

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star PE70 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1795  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 08:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 504
55% 434 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 16.6
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.4
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 761 869 542 350 329 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,011
Write 913
Mixed 702
SusWrite 530
228% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 55.6
216% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 381
358% 576 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 209%
Great: 243%
SDXC Card 64GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 24.6
Mixed 24
SusWrite 24.1
34% 25 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 15.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback