MSI MS-AC111

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-AC1111
MotherboardMSI MS-AC111  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 04:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 84.2
40% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 324
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
MSI(1462 AC11) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 8.03 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 145 143 147 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 139
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 145
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 7.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-AC111 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-AC111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback