Asus X550DP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X550DP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550DP
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140714
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 03:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5350M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 88.6
52% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 89.2
12% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 89
6% 89 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual Graphics
Asus(1043 21AD) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 77 88 97 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 78.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 86.6
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550DP Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550DP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback