HP p7-1587c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1587c  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 01:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 77.4
46% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 137
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.1000
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.5
3% 4 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 87 100 91 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 81
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 83.7
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 130 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1587c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1587c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback