Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '22 at 21:30
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 77.2 1-Core 173 2-Core 345 104% 199 Pts	4-Core 669 8-Core 1,246 114% 957 Pts	64-Core 2,206 136% 2,206 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 120 Parallax 124 108% 126 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 102 Splatting 89 89% 112 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 439 445 448 445 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 431 Mixed 356 SusWrite 443 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 52.6 178% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 196 141% 181 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 13,327 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 182 181 182 183 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
silicon-power 4GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.3 3.2 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 3.3 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.1 6% 5.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB 8,257 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 11.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,146x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,717x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	915x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	883x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	700x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,484

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16