Lenovo 20QKS27F00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20QKS27F00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QKS27F00
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 37
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 136
48% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 282
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5127) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.12.03
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.7
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 12
Splatting 7.9
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 491 856 971 999 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 528
Write 576
Mixed 546
SusWrite 671
131% 580 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 46.2
158% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 501
392% 528 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 135%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20QKS27F00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20QKS27F00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback