Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 17:28
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 416
56% 415 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 40.1
36% 42 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 43
Splatting 27.9
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5514
Write 4,754
Mixed 5,092
1,142% 5,120 MB/s
4K Read 419
4K Write 364
4K Mixed 334
1,256% 372 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 1,127
867% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
294GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41% Average
Read 75.8
Write 72.7
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 66.6
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback