Acer Veriton M2611

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M2611  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M2611
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 17:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 161
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 227
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 16.3
14% 16.9 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 15
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 120 129 63 68 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 165
Write 106
Mixed 111
SusWrite 104
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 14.5
61% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 18.5
14% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
179GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 108 106 109 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 88.1
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 109
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
103GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M2611 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M2611

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback