HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 463
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 344.11
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.8
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS240G 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 41 35 25 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 87%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
18GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 62 67 68 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 91
Write 80.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 68
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback