ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu D153400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Fujitsu D153400 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D1534
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '22 at 11:32
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100 1,546 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 53.6 1-Core 17.8 2-Core 26.1 25% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 30.9 8-Core 33.5 4% 32.2 Pts	64-Core 32.7 2% 32.7 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 3650 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 9598) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.2 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.5 2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Super Talent UltraDrive ME 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2030 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 505 Write 17.9 Mixed 27.7 38% 184 MB/s	4K Read 135 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 3.3 210% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 110%
Samsung SP2514N 250GB 598 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 51GB free Firmware: VF100-41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 381 Write 9.1 Mixed 21.5 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 136 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 5,827% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 38%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 20.1 Write 13.3 Mixed 13.8 19% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 21%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 1GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 3.3 SusWrite 3.7 6% 5.75 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.57% Terrible	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback