Acer Aspire 1810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 1810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM11-MS
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime61.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 21.6
28% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 19.6
8-Core 19.8
3% 19.7 Pts
64-Core 21.6
1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.3
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 28 60 36 49 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 71.9
Write 65.1
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 43.7
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663QZ3-CE6 M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1810T Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback