JW JW-PH67A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardJW JW-PH67A  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120423
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 16:19
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 344
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Device(2319 1787) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 122 138 139 165 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 178
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 140
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JW-PH67A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: JW JW-PH67A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback