Medion invalid

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion invalid  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 346
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Elitegroup(1019 1031) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 16.5
15% 17.2 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 396 406 405 400 221 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 409
Mixed 349
SusWrite 360
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 47.7
160% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 253
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 13.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical invalid Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Medion invalid

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback