Fujitsu ESPRIMO C720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO C720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3224-A1
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 15:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 346
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 18.3
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 31 33 32 30 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 405
Write 344
Mixed 353
SusWrite 56.3
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 34
122% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 181
162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
193GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 61
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 64
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
280GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 32.6
Write 33
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 40.4
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO C720 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback