Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung RF510/RF410/RF710  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 91.5
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 92.9
56% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 212
22% 177 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420M
Sanyo(144D C08E) 2GB
CLim: 500 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 2.4
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
229GB free
Firmware: PB4OC66G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,356
Write 35.3
Mixed 37.1
580% 810 MB/s
4K Read 491
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
20,547% 164 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4OC66G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.1
Write 55
Mixed 30.5
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
Flash USB Disk 17TB
15.5TB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 16
Write 11.5
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 22.6
22% 16 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
68% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10%
Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
532GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 20.6
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 30
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CF8 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback