Lenovo 20C600JBUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20C600JBUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C600JBUK
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 10:51
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 125
60% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 202
30% 216 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNA-DC/U3 240GB
214GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 115 100 142 116 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 298
Write 275
Mixed 258
SusWrite 136
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 21.7
70% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 95.7
DQ Mixed 107
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 55%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 256GB-$48
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.W
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 364
Write 176
Mixed 242
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 23.6
66% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 46.1
63% 120 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1315 CT4G3S1339M.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 10
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C600JBUK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C600JBUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback