Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 07:12
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 186
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 710
62% 530 Pts
64-Core 2,268
140% 2,268 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 85.6
76% 90 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 73.3
71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 614 453 420 420 418 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 457
354% 1,589 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 70.7
233% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 530
402% 543 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 221%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
228GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1483 392 392 393 393 393 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,373
SusWrite 574
362% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 73.8
246% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 571
434% 588 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback