Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 06:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 528
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 7.5
5% 26 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,199
Write 902
Mixed 780
213% 960 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 56.7
192% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 221
231% 372 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 77 62 57 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 55
Write 55.7
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 63.6
76% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 64%
HITACHI HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 146
Write 42.4
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 42.3
79% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback