Lenovo F0DN001PUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 71% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0DN001PUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36F5
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 06:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 71%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 142
54% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 269
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 36F5) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 19.5
11% 15 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.5
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 82 119 129 139 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 153
Mixed 105
SusWrite 114
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 26.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0DN001PUS Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0DN001PUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback