Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 05:39
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 975
88% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,706
106% 1,706 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 174
Parallax 176
145% 176 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 154
Splatting 131
126% 158 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$47
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 116 115 143 222 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 407
Write 336
Mixed 370
SusWrite 163
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 34.3
130% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 164
159% 254 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
402GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 188 184 189 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 144
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 188
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
215GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 112 112 70 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 126
Write 117
Mixed 74
SusWrite 96.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25DB 8TB
2TB free, PID 25db
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 106 104 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 108
132% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 34.2
120% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 11.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 105%
Great: 175%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback