Acer Veriton N4630G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton N4630G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton N4630G
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 21:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 348
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 086C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 144 146 139 144 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 383
Mixed 285
SusWrite 166
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 44.9
158% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 174
179% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB
252GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 30.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 36
44% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton N4630G Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton N4630G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback