Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A359

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A359  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB67
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 170
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 282
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1E26 002D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT0300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 257 302 297 299 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 412
Write 348
Mixed 316
SusWrite 286
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 25.9
86% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
263% 346 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A359 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A359

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback