Lenovo 20T7S1VY00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20T7S1VY00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T7S1VY00
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 19:58
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 42.3
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 155
44% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 447
59% 444 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 507F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.40.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 12.3
4% 8.3 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.9
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256-D22 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2S222
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 437 201 154 172 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 547
Write 489
Mixed 475
SusWrite 261
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 10.4
40% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 375
325% 485 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20T7S1VY00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T7S1VY00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback