Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$185
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 454
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 78.8
Parallax 76
64% 77.6 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 60.5
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 96 106 103 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 387
Write 152
Mixed 107
SusWrite 102
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 82.4
75% 113 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 104%
WD WD2003FZEX-00Z4SA0 ATA Device (TurboPC EX) 2TB
359GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 119
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback