Asus N550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus N550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JK
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 12:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 150
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 497
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 11CD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1771
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 17.7
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.2
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 2.6 83 2.6 58 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 387
Write 302
Mixed 272
SusWrite 56.3
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 14.7
94% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 29.8
44% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GRSL Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JK Builds (Compare 822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback