TR 911S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTR 911S  (all builds)
MotherboardTR
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 03:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 437
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Quanta(152D 1128) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 38.2
32% 40 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 33.9
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV5-8Q256 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A882101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 213 212 208 210 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 430
Mixed 404
SusWrite 210
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 47.2
154% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 251
210% 304 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
431GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 76 79 75 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 63
Write 80.9
Mixed 38
SusWrite 76.1
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911S Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: TR 911S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback