PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79-2011 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200319 |
Uptime | 33.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '22 at 03:49 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
65% 116 Pts
|
61% 510 Pts
|
54% 874 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 4378) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
32% 39.8 fps
|
18% 24.6 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M393B2K70DMB- 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
31.6%
Below average
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
40% 99.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2696 v2IntelBench 70%, 376 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 2x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 1x |
GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $529 |