Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 428
50% 388 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 332 344 337 343 327 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 690
Mixed 448
SusWrite 354
142% 642 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.7
198% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 414
336% 477 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 149%
Great: 153%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
666GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 97.2
Mixed 67
SusWrite 102
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2800, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback