Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 14:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 356
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 34FE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.4
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03190003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 112 58 52 66 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64% Good
Read 458
Write 336
Mixed 111
SusWrite 118
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 30.5
103% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 123
98% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
459GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 109
64% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67M-UD2H Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback