Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 52.8 2-Core 81.3 35% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 69.5 8-Core 76.9 10% 73.2 Pts	64-Core 76.9 5% 76.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1FE0) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 4.6 2% 4.1 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 3 Splatting 5.5 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 436 Write 240 Mixed 291 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 31 107% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 161 126% 174 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 29%, 2,523 samples	25x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	23x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 2,804 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	37x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	25x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	19x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GBBench 57%, 1,308 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,996 samples	32x
8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 1x4GBMicronBench 31%, 690 samples	19x
M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,518 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16