Biostar Hi-Fi H87S3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi H87S3+  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130705
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 08:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 186
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 374
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Biostar(1565 1110) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 6.8
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 198 199 141 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 445
Write 199
Mixed 240
SusWrite 172
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 40.6
133% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 177
134% 185 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
152GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 87 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 84
Write 85.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 87.1
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10242253 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi H87S3+ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi H87S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback