Acer TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire GX-781
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 02:54
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 147
71% 115 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 298
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 31.6
26% 31.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 30
Splatting 22.4
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 105 30 29 32 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 426
Write 365
Mixed 350
SusWrite 88.9
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 38.5
142% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 201
172% 250 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 91%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 128GB
14GB free, PID 0153
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 14 13 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Read 36.2
Write 33.3
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 13.8
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TC-780 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback