Fujitsu CELSIUS M770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M770  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3498-U1
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 180
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 639
60% 498 Pts
64-Core 1,546
96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 130
Parallax 121
94% 122 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 106
Splatting 115
104% 130 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1016 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10200016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 596 581 548 549 527 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,350
Write 1346
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 577
255% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 37.2
143% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 27.8
67% 129 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 141%
Great: 261%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180
938GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 373 377 398 384 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 422
Write 384
Mixed 392
SusWrite 379
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 26.1
82% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 40
DQ Mixed 29.2
23% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180
666GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 374 378 399 384 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 447
Write 423
Mixed 407
SusWrite 379
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 31.3
110% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 270
182% 210 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 16.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M770 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback