Medionpc MS-7501

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedionpc MS-7501  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7501
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 425
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 81.3
36% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 119
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E157) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S511 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 216
Write 74.2
Mixed 111
SusWrite 72.9
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 88.7
66% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 68%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
556GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 88.4
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 88.6
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 49%
General USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.4 3.8 4.5 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 3.3
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 4
7% 6.33 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical MS-7501 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7501

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback