Asus WS X299 SAGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus WS X299 SAGE  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 15:25
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 248
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 835
74% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,319
82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 194
Parallax 182
143% 184 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 183
Splatting 129
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 309 300 300 305 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 448
Mixed 424
SusWrite 309
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 48.9
166% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 198 195 200 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 185
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 198
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1
244% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M8A2666C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 26.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 9.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 SAGE Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 SAGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback