Asus K95VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K95VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K95VM
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 08:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 161
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 398
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 10CC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 221 125 241 241 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 391
Write 38.1
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 186
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 21.1
85% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 38.2
DQ Mixed 66.8
86% 164 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
910GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 448 448 428 442 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 428
Mixed 413
SusWrite 442
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 41
132% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 360
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K95VM Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K95VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback