Lenovo 060616U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 060616U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 01:30
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TTO-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 491
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3650) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 21.6
14% 18.5 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_ISSS316-128GD 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S180718b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 397
Write 162
Mixed 162
SusWrite 105
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 32.3
117% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 112
93% 136 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 104 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 62.6
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 102
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
297GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 64 66 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 104
Write 60.4
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 64.7
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
367GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 62.5
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 56.3
81% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 060616U Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 060616U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback