Daten DC3E-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDaten DC3E-S  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten DA320MXV
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 19:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 650
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 87.1
Parallax 75.4
74% 84.3 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 69
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,554
Write 668
Mixed 806
221% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 79.6
302% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 318
274% 391 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 16G4D26 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DC3E-S Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Daten DC3E-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback