HP 23-b010ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 23-b010ea  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AED
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 147
51% 91 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 138
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M
HP(103C 2AED) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.3
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.25.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 221 223 218 224 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 230
Write 206
Mixed 184
SusWrite 221
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 12.5
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 23.2
49% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-b010ea Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-b010ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback