ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alaska EIRD-SAM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Alaska EIRD-SAM (all builds)
Motherboard	EIRD-SAM
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration	1918 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 52.1 1-Core 21.1 2-Core 42.1 27% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 84 11% 84.1 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 99 98 99 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 469 Write 319 Mixed 320 SusWrite 115 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 24.2 98% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 165 130% 182 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 73%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 4.9 7 6.8 6.2 7 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 5.3 8% 7.98 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSK64W6N 1x2GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.5% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback