| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Latitude E6500 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0X564R |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 07 '22 at 15:17 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.6%
Below average
|
38% 57.5 Pts
|
10% 75.1 Pts
|
5% 74.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro NVS 160M
Dell(1028 024F) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
|
0.51%
Terrible
|
0% 1.03 fps
|
0% 0.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kuijia DK500/128G 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 134 99 77 139 MB/s
|
23.8%
Poor
|
35% 156 MB/s
|
28% 9.7 MB/s
|
14% 23.3 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
146GB free
Firmware: PBBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 50 46 50 53 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
33% 45.2 MB/s
|
106% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.5%
Very poor
|
13% 4.7 GB/s
|
8% 2.7 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6500 Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6500
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro NVS 160MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,458 samples | 20x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $80 |