Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2807 814 User benchmarks, average bench 31% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Memory 26.7 1-Core 12 2-Core 20.4 14% 19.7 Pts	4-Core 27.7 8-Core 32 4% 29.9 Pts	64-Core 27.5 2% 27.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM00.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 78 82 77 79 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 156 Write 84.8 Mixed 113 SusWrite 79.5 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 9.2 44% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 90.6 71% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 73%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.2 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 3.3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 5.4 7% 6.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSK64W6N 1x2GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 275 15% 275 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16