HP 860-079na

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP 860-079na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151026
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '22 at 13:33
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 220 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 656 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 656 41% 656 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.08 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.2% Good	Lighting 86.2 Reflection 100 Parallax 88.9 70% 91.7 fps	MRender 88.1 Gravity 85.9 Splatting 75 67% 83 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 688GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 429 445 452 434 386 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 430 Mixed 373 SusWrite 413 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 41.5 154% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 285 230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 339GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 131 129 123 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 148 Write 116 Mixed 31 SusWrite 122 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 107%
SMI 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 3000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.11% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.7 7% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 34% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G26C16U4W.16FE 2x16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 29.3 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 36.5 SC Mixed 27.5 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 860-079na Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

System: HP 860-079na

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $77Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 1,560 samples	4x
BL16G26C16U4W.16FE 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 26 samples	2x
CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP 2x16GBCrucialBench 84%, 262 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $818

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16