Lenovo 20F9S0NS00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20F9S0NS00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F9S0NS00
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 08:28
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 150
58% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 216
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF256G8L 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L15P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 244 270 273 274 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 775
Mixed 726
SusWrite 297
207% 944 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 81.6
273% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 269
302% 518 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Generic External 2TB
504GB free
Firmware: 0300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 33.3
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 27.2
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 69%
USB SG Flash 32GB
22GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 27
Write 19.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 13.4
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F9S0NS00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F9S0NS00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback