Acer Aspire XC-605G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605G
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 04:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 272
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 424 430 442 447 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 437
Mixed 397
SusWrite 437
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.2
182% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 289
231% 322 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback