MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 17:49
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 620
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 60
Parallax 78.3
44% 64.3 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 43.8
45% 56 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 259 259 262 261 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,439
Write 573
Mixed 909
SusWrite 275
176% 799 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 48.1
170% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 109
111% 189 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 137%
Great: 236%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
676GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 160 158 162 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 183
Write 168
Mixed 106
SusWrite 159
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.8
7% 3.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
181GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 118
Write 95.7
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 104
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 170 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 171
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
88GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 100 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 117
Write 97.5
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 102
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G266681 BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 3R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 21% 63 302 242 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0560 GF276
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback